An ongoing problem students have is not substantiating their assertions. Unsubstantiated assertions have little/no value in the academic setting. In discussions or papers, you should always explain the rationale for your statements. If appropriate, explain the rationale and provide references that will support your statements. Here are some examples:

Unsubstantiated Assertion: A synthesis of behavioral and cognitive learning theories, social learning (cognitive) theory blended the idea that learning comes from observing and imitating models, while recognizing the learner’s ability to process information through symbolism.

Substantiated Assertion: A synthesis of behavioral and cognitive learning theories (Black & Mendenhall, 1990; Lefrancois, 1999; Sims & Lorenzi, 1992), social learning (cognitive) theory (SCT) blended the idea that learning comes from observing and imitating models, while recognizing the learner’s ability to process information through symbolism. Or, as Sims and Lorenzi (1992) wrote, “Social cognitive theory seems to offer a path leading away from the zero-sum controversy represented by the notions of behaviorism versus cognitivism; it seems to capture the best elements of both frameworks” (p. 23).

The former is really nothing more than opinion. The latter builds on the work of other researchers as a foundation for the argument.

If you need more information on this topic, please see my instructional video below: